Π. Ήφαιστος-Θανατηφόρες παλινωδίες

Παναγιώτης Ήφαιστος, www.ifestosedu.gr 

30.4.2010.

 Θανατηφόρες παλινωδίες

Πριν μερικά χρόνια συνέντευξη-ομιλία συμβατικά κορυφαίου πολιτικού προσώπου [ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΚΑΚΟ ΝΑ ΟΜΟΛΟΓΗΣΩΜΕ ΟΤΙ  ΠΡΟΚΕΙΤΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ κ. ΠΡΩΘΥΠΟΥΡΓΟ-ΑΥΤΟΣ ΝΑ ΤΑ ΛΕΓΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΕΜΕΙΣ ΝΑ ΑΙΣΧΥΝΩΜΕΘΑ ΝΑ ΛΕΓΩΜΕ ΟΤΙ ΤΑ ΛΕΓΕΙ????]. 

Μεταξύ άλλων μαργαριταριών: «Η έννοια εθνικό συμφέρον δεν υπάρχει στον σύγχρονο παγκοσμοποιημένο πλανήτη όπου η κυριαρχία δεν έχει έννοια. Οι έλληνες πρέπει να σταματήσουν να σκέφτονται παρωχημένα».

 Έτυχε λοιπόν να ακούσω τον ίδιο αυτές τις μέρες: «πρέπει ο ελληνικός λαός να κάνει θυσίες για το εθνικό συμφέρον. Ότι είναι να γίνει θα γίνει για να σωθεί το έθνος». 

Ο ίδιος επίσης ιδρώνει να πείσει τους κρατοκεντρικούς διεθνείς θεσμούς (συνάγω: υπάρχουν κράτη που λειτουργούν με όρους εθνικούς συμφέροντος και όχι ένας πλανητικός ανθρωπολογικός ακταρμάς) και κραυγάζει κατατρομαγμένος να ενταθεί η διεθνής διακυβέρνηση για να ελεγχθούν αυτά τα εγκληματικά διεθνικά στοιχεία (τα χθεσινά είδωλά του που νόμισε ότι όταν θα διακινούνταν με ευκολία διαμέσου των συνόρων θα συμπεριφέρονταν αλτρουιστικά και αγαθοεργά). Τα τσιράκια ενός τέτοιου κερδοσκόπου, εξάλλου, γυροφέρνουν στα κυβερνητικά γραφεία της οικονομικά υπόδουλης για πολλά χρόνια πλέον Ελλάδας.
Βέβαια, ισχύει αυτό που λένε στο χωριό μου, ότι δηλαδή η ουρά του σκύλου ποτέ δεν μπορεί να ισιώσει. Έτσι, τον άκουσα προχθές να πετάει και ένα αντιφατικό με τα νέα λεγόμενά του: «έχουμε ανάγκη από μια παγκόσμια κυβέρνηση». 

Ξέρετε, δεν είναι ανάγκη να το λέμε κάθε μέρα αλλά ας το επαναλάβω. Πνευματικά είναι τα αίτια των παθών μας. Πολλά έπονται ακόμη γιατί βλέπω τους ίδιους ενόχους της πνευματικής ενοχής να έχουν ακόμη λόγο στην πολιτικοστοχαστική ζωή. Αντί εξορίας στην έρημο όπου τα σοβαρά κράτη πετάνε τα πνευματικά σκουπίδια (εννοώ δια νόμου να ενθαρρύνουν οσους μας ρύπαναν πνευματικά τις δύο τελευταίες δεκαετίες και όσοι άμεσα ή έμμεσα άγγιξαν λεφτά του Σόρος να βγουν αν έχουν συνείδηση σε πρόωρη σύνταξη--[ΓΙΑΤΙ ΘΑ ΚΗΡΥΞΩΜΕ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΣΤΑΣΙΟ??-Ο ΒΕΝΙΖΕΛΙΣΜΟΣ ΣΤΗΝΕΙ ΔΙΚΕΣ ΤΩΝ ΕΞ!]).

Αν και δεν μου αρέσουν οι προβλέψεις, κάνω μια: Θα έλθει ο Νταβούτογλου στην Ελλάδα. Αφού εμείς μιλάμε μόνο για την υφαλοκρηπίδα και αυτός για μηδενικά προβλήματα θα μας επισείσουν κάποια τρις δολάρια όσο και η αξία του υποθαλάσσιου πλούτου του Αιγαίου. Κάποιου θα φέρουν γεωτρύπανα, κάποιες αμερικάνικες εταιρείες know how και ότι μείνει θα μοιραστεί μεταξύ Ελλάδας και Τουρκίας. Αυτό σημαίνει μηδενικά προβλήματα στο Αιγαίο και κάτι αντίστοιχο πρέπει να σκεφτόμαστε στην Θράκη και στην Κύπρο. 

Τώρα, γιατί ένας συγκαιρινός να διαμαρτυρηθεί!! Τόσο πεσμένος που είναι και τα πολιτικοστοχαστικά του ελίτ αλωμένα θα βομβαρδιστεί από τα παπαγαλάκια με την λογική άποψη: Εκεί που είμαστε χαμένοι θα πάρουμε από πάνω. Το ότι θα ισχύσει τα δικά μας κατά το ήμισυ δικά τους και τα δικά τους όλα δικά τους, θα αποσιωπάται. 

Ξέρετε, υπάρχουν μεγάλα εγκάθετα συνδικάτα εδώ στην Ελλάδα για να μπορούν να καταδικάζουν κάποια πράγματα στην σιωπή. 

Είπα για πρόβλεψη. Μακάρι να κάνω λάθος, είπε και ο Μίκης Θεοδωράκης προχθές.

 Τέλος μια λέξη για την χθεσινή ανάρτηση του Μίκη Θεοδωράκη. Δέχθηκε πολλές επιθέσεις –οι περισσότερες είδους πολιτικοστοχαστικής αλητείας – με το να του προσάπτουν ότι συνομωσιολογεί. Εγώ, από την δική μου επιστημονική σκοπιά μεθερμηνεύοντας συμπληρωματικά τα λεγόμενα του Μίκη, θα έλεγα τα εξής: 

Δεν είναι ζήτημα συνομωσίας. Τα οργανωμένα μεγάλα κράτη έχουν στρατηγικά σχέδια. Οι κερδοσκόποι είναι συχνά όργανά τους (αν και όχι πάντοτε καθότι συχνά στρέφονται και εναντίον τους, όπως αυτός ο ανεκδιήγητος κερδοσκόπος Σόρος). Έλεος δεν υπάρχει. 

Και όταν εμείς επί δύο δεκαετίες εμείς δηλώνουμε ότι είμαστε αναλώσιμοι ένα από τα εναλλακτικά σχέδια δράσης είναι: Αναλώστε τους τούτους τους ανόητους νεοέλληνες, κατασπαταλήστε τους, αποδυναμώστε τους, συρρικνώστε τους και αφήστε τους να κλαίνε καμιά πενηνταριά χρόνια την τύχη τους …».

NB. (Διαβάστε την καταπληκτική συνέντευξη του J. Perkins * ο οποίος, κατά τα άλλα, λέει πασίγνωστα πράγματα για όσους δεν εξετάζουν τους διεθνικούς δρώντες με ιδεολογικούς όρους αλλά υπό το πρίσμα του καταστροφικού κοινωνικά ανεξάρτητου ρόλου τους, ο οποίος ρόλος είναι είτε εξαρτημένη μεταβλητή της ισχύος είτε ανεξάρτητη μεταβλητή εν δυνάμει ανορθολογική και ζημιογόνα. Ζημιογόνα, για όλους).
-------------------------------------------------------------------

*Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: 

How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

We play an interview with, John Perkins–author of “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man”–who says he says he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then taking over their economies. [includes rush transcript]

The kj  protests this week in Bolivia come as Latin America is seeing significant success among popular progressive movements. From Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, Lula da Silva of Brazil to the changes of government in Uruguay and now Ecuador, there is a continent-wide trend that has Washington concerned. The US has long exploited countries throughout Central and Latin America for the natural resources, labor and land. Over the decades, this exploitation has been backed up by force and through devastating policies dictated to puppet regimes. Our next guest says he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries in Latin America and around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then taking over their economies. From 1971 to 1981, John Perkins worked for the international consulting firm of Chas T. Main. He described himself as an “economic hit man.” He"s written a memoir called Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. When he joined us in our fire house studio, we asked him to begin with how he came to be recruited first by the National Security Agency–far larger than the C.I.A.–and then this so-called international consulting firm of Chas T. Main.

• John Perkins, author of “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.”

Our next guest says he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries in Latin America and around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then taking over their economies. From 1971 to 1981 John Perkins worked for the international consulting firm, Chas Main. He described himself an “economic hitman.” He has written a memoir called Confessions of an Economic Hitman. When he joined us in our firehouse studio, I asked him to begin with how he came to be recruited first by the National Security Agency, far larger than the C.I.A., and then this so-called international consulting firm of Chas T. Main.

JOHN PERKINS: It was in the late 1960s, 1968. I was a student at business school and was recruited by the National Security Agency. They ran me through a series of tests–personality tests, lie detector tests—very sensitive barrage of testing. And during that process, they discovered that I would be a great candidate for an economic hit man. I was in business school at the time. And also they discovered a number of weaknesses in my character. I think, I have weaknesses that are pretty typical of our culture, the three big drugs of our culture: money, power and sex. And they discovered these weaknesses in me. There’s a lot in my book about my personal background that gets into that. Then they encouraged me to go into the Peace Corps. I lived in Ecuador for three years as a Peace Corps volunteer with indigenous people there, who today are at war with the oil companies. We were starting that process then, so I got some very good on-the-job training, so to speak. While I was still in Ecuador in the Peace Corps, a vice president from this private consulting firm in Boston that worked closely with the National Security Agency and the other intelligence communities came to Ecuador and continued my recruitment. When I got out of the Peace Corps, he recruited me. I went to work for his company in Boston, Charles T. Main and went through an extensive training program there with a remarkable woman, who is described in detail in the book, Claudine was her name. And she was extremely intelligent, extremely sharp, extremely seductive, and she hooked me. She knew exactly how to hook me. She benefited from all the tests that I’d gone through, knew my weaknesses. And she made it—she, first of all, hooked me into becoming an economic hit man and at the same time, warned me that this is a very dirty business and you must be completely committed to it or you shouldn’t take your first assignment in Indonesia.

AMY GOODMAN: Now, already people are going to be wondering, What is he talking about, economic hit man? Explain.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, really, over the past 30 to 40 years, we economic hit men have created the largest global empire in the history of the world. And we do this, typically—well, there are many ways to do it, but a typical one is that we identify a third-world country that has resources, which we covet. And often these days that’s oil, or might be the canal in the case of Panama. In any case, we go to that third-world country and we arrange a huge loan from the international lending community; usually the World Bank leads that process. So, let’s say we give this third-world country a loan of $1 billion. One of the conditions of that loan is that the majority of it, roughly 90, comes back to the United States to one of our big corporations, the ones we’ve all heard of recently, the Bechtels, the Halliburtons. And those corporations build in this third-world country large power plants, highways, ports, or industrial parks—big infrastructure projects that basically serve the very rich in those countries. The poor people in those countries and the middle class suffer; they don’t benefit from these loans, they don’t benefit from the projects. In fact, often their social services have to be severely curtailed in the process of paying off the debt. Now what also happens is that this third-world country then is saddled with a huge debt that it can’t possibly repay. For example, today, Ecuador. Ecuador’s foreign debt, as a result of the economic hit man, is equal to roughly 50 of its national budget. It cannot possibly repay this debt, as is the case with so many third-world countries. So, now we go back to those countries and say, look, you borrowed all this money from us, and you owe us this money, you can’t repay your debts, so give our oil companies your oil at very cheap costs. And in the case of many of these countries, Ecuador is a good example here, that means destroying their rain forests and destroying their indigenous cultures. That’s what we’re doing today around the world, and we’ve been doing it—it began shortly after the endof World War II. It has been building up over time until today where it’s really reached mammoth proportions where we control most of the resources of the world.

AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins, talk about your experience in Panama. You had the opportunity to meet the Head of Panama before he was killed, Omar Torrijos. How did you end up there?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, Panama was one of these pivotal countries at the time and Omar Torrijos, who was the President of Panama. He followed a long line of oligarchy dictators that basically were puppets of the U.S. government that we had installed 50 years prior when we took over the country. Omar Torrijos was the first one to break that cycle, and he was a very, very popular president. He was popular throughout much of the world. Many people believed he should have won the Nobel Peace Prize and might have had he not died or been killed. He protected the downtrodden everywhere. And the United States was at the time, President Carter was negotiating a new Canal treaty with Torrijos and ultimately that Canal treaty went through. But it caused a tremendous amount of turmoil in our own country. In fact, it was passed in Congress by only one vote, that won the ratification of the Canal. So, we economic hit men were really looking beyond that process, or how we could win Panama over regardless of what happened to the Canal Treaty. I was there before the treaty was signed in 1972 and I was trying to bring Torrijos around. I was trying to catch him. I was trying to get him. I was trying to hook him the way we hooked everybody else. He arranged for me to meet with him in this private bungalow one day, and this is described in detail, the conversation, in the book. But basically what he said to me is, Look, I know the game you guys are playing. I know what you’re trying to do here. You’re trying to saddle us with huge debts. You’re trying to make us totally dependent upon you, and you’re trying to corrupt me. I know what this game is and I’m not playing. I don’t need the money. I’m not looking to get personally wealthy out of this. I want to help my poor people. I want you to build the projects that you’re supposed to build, that you build in other countries, but I want you to build them for our poor people, not for our rich people. And he said, if you do that, I’ll see to it that you and your company get a lot more work in this country. Good work that will help our people. Well, I was really conflicted at this because, as an economic hit man, I was supposed to get him under our control. I was supposed to hook him. But as a partner in this company and as the chief economist for this firm, I also wanted to get the work for the firm, and in this case it was very obvious that the economic hit men weren’t going to get through to Torrijos, so I went along with him. But at the time, I was deeply concerned because I knew that this system is built on the assumption that leaders like Torrijos are corruptible and they are all over the world for the most part. When one stands up to the system as Torrijos was doing, it’s not only a threat in his country, like Panama, that we’re not going to get our way there, but it also may be seen as setting a very bad example for the rest of the world that once one leader stands up—and at that time there was another leader standing up, too, who was the President of Ecuador, Jaime Roldos. They were both standing up to the U.S. government. They were both standing up to the oil companies and the economic hit men, and it was a very big concern to me. I knew in my heart that if this continued, something was going to give. Of course, it did. Both of these men were assassinated by what we call the jackals, C.I.A.-sanctioned assassins.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. The conversation you had with Omar Torrijos as he goes through history, your conversation in the early 1970s. But talking about what happened in Guatemala, the overthrow of the democratically elected leader Arbenz by United Fruit and the C.I.A-backed coup there in 1954, and you reconstruct this conversation about George Bush’s company Zapata Oil eventually taking over United Brands, which was United Fruit, and then he talks about giving your company the business, Omar Torrijos, saying that he believed the Japanese would finance the canal that would be built, though turning to your company. And he says “They provide the money, they will do the construction.” And you write, “It struck me, Bechtel will be out in the cold.” The biggest construction job in recent history. Omar Torrijos paused. Bechtel’s President is George Schultz, Nixon’s Secretary of the Treasury. You can imagine the clout he’s got and the notorious temper. Bechtel is loaded with Nixon, Ford, and Bush cronies. I’ve been told that the Bechtel family pulls the strings of the Republican Party. You talk about the corporatocracy, the bringing together of government and corporate power.

JOHN PERKINS: Yes. Well, it got worse, of course. At that time, George Schultz was President of Bechtel. Casper Weinberger was their Chief Counsel, a senior officer in the corporation. They were opposed to Torrijos, not only on the U.S. turning the Canal over to Panama, but even more importantly perhaps because Torrijos was actively negotiating with the Japanese to build a new sea level canal. As you know, the current canal is based on locks and the larger ships in the world can’t go through it. So, the idea was to build a sea level canal where every ship could go through, and the Japanese were offering to finance this. But if they financed it, it would be their construction companies, their engineering companies that would build it. Bechtel was incensed over this. They absolutely could not tolerate the idea of this happening. We knew this very strongly, we had to win Torrijos over. Now, then—

AMY GOODMAN: And then, as you said, Schultz becomes Secretary of State under Reagan, Casper Weinberger becomes Secretary of Defense under Reagan. They’re the, you know, the heads of Bechtel Corporation.

JOHN PERKINS: Yeah. Yes. Carter negotiated the treaty and then lost the election, partly because of this treaty, partly because of what happened in Iran, which is another story that I was involved in. And then when Reagan became President, Schultz went from President of Bechtel to Secretary of State and Weinberger went from Chief Counsel of Bechtel to Secretary of Defense. They went back to Panama and said, Okay, Omar, now let’s talk. We want the canal back, we want the military bases back in the canal zone and more than anything, we want you to stop talking to the Japanese. And Torrijos said, No, I’m a sovereign country. I am not opposing the United States. I’m not a socialist, I’m not a communist, I’m not siding with Cuba or Russia or China, I’m simply standing up for the rights of my people. We have the right to negotiate with whoever can build us the best canal. I have the right to negotiate with the Japanese. He took a very strong stand and within a few months, his plane crashed into a mountain, blew up and crashed into a mountain, and it was very strong evidence that it had been blown up by a tape recorder which was handed to him at the end that was full of explosives. There is no question in my mind and in the mind of much of the world that this was the jackals, the C.I.A.-sanctioned assassins. I’ve seen them work in many places. Just a couple of months before that, they had done the same thing to Jaime Roldos, President of Ecuador, the first democratically elected president of Ecuador in decades, had replaced a military junta, democratically elected, and he stood up to the U.S. oil companies. We economic hit men couldn’t get through to him and his helicopter blew up then and there.

AMY GOODMAN: Why was he standing up to U.S. oil companies?

JOHN PERKINS: Because once again, he ran in the first democratic elections in Ecuador in many decades. He ran on a platform of sovereignty for his country. And if there is oil in Ecuador then, he said, the Ecuadorans should benefit from it. And once he became president, he began to introduce this. He set up a Hydrocarbons Act, he called it, which was basically a petroleum act that would ensure that if oil came out of Ecuador, the majority of the funds from that oil would go to his people. The oil companies would get a reasonable payment. But the majority would go to his people. He was setting a precedent that the oil companies couldn’t stand, because throughout the world, they were exploiting all these countries, as they still are. And Roldos said, I’m not going to let that happen to my country. The oil companies couldn’t bear to see that, not just because ofEcuador but, again, because of the precedent this would establish. And Roldos and Torrijos were really partners in a way. At the same time, they were supporting each other, and they both had to go. And they both went.

AMY GOODMAN: And what were your thoughts at the time? I mean, you continued doing this work.

JOHN PERKINS: It was a very pivotal point for me that—throughout my work, as I describe in the book, my conscience was torn. And to me this is one of most interesting parts of my own personal story. I think of myself as a pretty good person. I grew up 300 years a yankee Calvinist in Vermont and New Hampshire. I come from a very patriotic background. I grew up in a very strictly Republican family, very conservative. I have very strong values. I’m very loyal to my country. And—

AMY GOODMAN: Descendant of Tom Paine and Ethan Allen?

JOHN PERKINS: That’s right. They’re distant relatives. And my parents steeped me in American history and in the values of our founding fathersof our country. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all people, all over the world. I believed very strongly in this. And yet at the same time, I was very seduceable to money, power, sex. All these things came my way, and I was doing things that I was patted on the back for by the president of the World Bank, Robert MacNamara. And I was Chief Economist of a big consulting firm in Boston. I had 50 people working for me, PhDs, MBAs. I was doing work that macroeconomics in college had taught me was good work to do. It’s all a scam.

AMY GOODMAN: Why have very few people heard of this company, Main?

JOHN PERKINS: We were a very quiet company. We had about 2,000 professional employees, which is not small. We were a closely held company, that means we were owned like a partnership, about 5% of us owned the company so we didn’t have to disclose our books to the S.E.C. or anybody. We were a very private, very quiet company and we were serving the interests of empire. The company no longer exists. In the early 1980s, the partners sold out to a larger engineering construction firm, and so the company essentially went out of existence at that point. I think it was getting a little too hot for us at this point. But it was intentional. We were very strictly forbidden from talking to the press. I broke that rule at one point. I wrote an op-ed piece on the Panama Canal for the Boston Globe and was severely chastised within the company. So, it was intentional that we were very quiet.

AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hitman.