June 30, 2010, 6:09 pm                       Iceland is, of course, one of the great economic disaster stories  of all time. An economy that produced a decent standard of living for  its people was in effect hijacked by a combination of free-market  ideology and crony capitalism; 
one   of the papers (pdf) at the 
conference I  just attended in Luxembourg shows that the benefits of the  financial bubble went overwhelmingly to a small minority at the top of  the income distribution:
 Olafsson and Kristjansson
Olafsson and Kristjansson And in the process of building short-lived financial empires, a  handful of operators built up enormous debts that their fellow citizens  are now expected to repay.
But there’s an odd coda to the story. Unlike other disaster economies  around the European periphery – economies that are trying to  rehabilitate themselves through austerity and deflation — Iceland built  up so much debt and found itself in such dire straits that orthodoxy was  out of the question. 
Instead, Iceland devalued its currency  massively  and imposed capital controls. [ΑΥΤΗ  ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΛΥΣΙΣ ΔΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΜΟΝΟΝ ΑΥΤΗ!!!] 
And a strange thing has happened: although Iceland is generally  considered to have experienced the worst financial crisis in history,  its punishment has actually been substantially less than that of other  nations. Here’s GDP:
 Eurostat
Eurostat And here’s employment:
 Eurostat
Eurostat The moral of the story seems to be that if you’re going to have a  crisis, it’s better to have a really, really bad one. Otherwise, you’ll  end up taking the advice of people who assure you that even more  suffering will cure what ails you. 
 
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου